Innovation sucks!!

Innovation is extremely alluring to companies and startups. It offers so much potential. However innovation  takes mountains of time. You just can’t come up with a Facebook, Dyson or Ford in 5 minutes!! It’s simply not a light bulb moment. It can take 1000’s of  attempts. “I have not failed. I’ve just found 1000 ways that won’t work”Thomas A Edison. Innovation is a gradual internal company and external market process.  This makes innovation very frustrating for the entrepreneur because the one thing they have in short supply is time! Innovation is awesome but it also sucks!!

Innovation has to build-up momentum and be developed over several or many iterations. This evolution of ideas can be within the same team, company or marketplace. It can even be ideas shared between different markets or countries. That’s the great thing about our modern economy, its survival of the fittest ideas. The key to unlock innovation is for the idea to be at the right time and in the right place.

I’m sorry, but time and time again I hear startups saving we are the next Facebook, Twitter, etc. In reality you need to know where are you in the innovation cycle – that ranges from innovation to commoditisation. Geoff Moore ‘Crossing the chasm’ is always a good book to read on this subject. The position in this innovation cycle dictates your actions, growth and timescales.

The challenge with innovation is that it takes eduction, thus the need for time. The educating of potential customers is difficult because people don’t really like change and risk. Companies, especially big ones, definitely don’t like change and risk. Education costs an awful lot of money whether with mass market consumer items or niche corporate b2b products. The marketing message needs repeating over and over and over again. First mover advantage is great but second mover can be better. Just look at Google (2nd to market) and Yahoo (1st to market) and who came of on top.

The trick is to get into a market niche on an upward curve, get running with the pack (competition) and then gradually innovate. As always it is easier to say than do!! Apple is a great example. The success they enjoy today with the iPhone popularity goes way back to 1993 with the failure of the Apple Newton. Apples’ iTunes which is intrinsically linked to the iPod and therefore the iPhone originally benefited from the downfall of Napster. These innovations have been brewing for many years and between many competitors.

The great thing about innovation is that it has unlimited possibilities. It’s brings the combination of creativity and exciting growth potential. Innovation is awesome but it takes time, money, careful listening to the market and mountains of persistence. One hit innovation wonders are rare and not the norm. All of this can be frustrating for startups because no one is in a rush except the startup and the one things startups are most short of is time.


Tags: , , , ,

4 Responses to “Innovation sucks!!”

  1. Susi O'Neill Says:

    Great take on innovation challenges Nick, understanding the difference between continuous and disruptive innovation is also a crucial driver to see how your product sits within the exist market, or creates a brand new one. I’ve done a publication about disruptive innovation for the creative industries:

  2. Nick Barker Says:

    Excellent point Susi. I’ve also heard innovation can be divided into three categories: incremental (continuous), radical and transformational.

    I read Blue Ocean Strategy some years ago and the authors W. Chan Kim and Renée Mauborgne referred alot to disruptive innovation. The idea is that ‘high growth and profits an organization can generate by creating new demand in an uncontested market space’. They use examples such as The Body Shop and Cirque du Soleil, who both disrupted an existing industry by creating a new one.

    Thanks for the comment and the link.

  3. Susi O'Neill Says:

    I’m actually sitting with a copy of Blue Ocean Strategy here now and I’m going to reading it this week (in the Soleil!), I hadn’t heard the distinction between radical and transformational innovation before, one to investigate…

  4. Nick Barker Says:

    LoL!! Business Schools separate radical and transformational innovation. The Blue Ocean Strategy has some good ideas and a catchy story. Practical implementation of the Strategy Canvas can be a challenge (like anything real). Adam Bird read the book too and wrote a post about his implementation – he found holes in the theory (I think – can’t find post).

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: